The transcripts of the official inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press. More…

Okay, well, that's the second point. All right, yes, and I accused Judge Eady's judgment -- not the man -- of being amoral and arrogant. Arrogant in the sense that I felt it was worrying that one man, one judge, seemed to be handling some of the more contentious privacy cases. One man seemed to be attaching much more weight to the right to privacy in the Human Rights Act rather than the right to freedom of expression, and, yes, several -- several very significant cases seemed to indicate that he believed the law should be morally neutral. I'm delighted to see since then that the pendulum has been swinging the other way, and I think there's been some judgments by Justice Tugendhat and Justice Nicol which have been very significant. If I could just refer to them --

Keyboard shortcuts

j previous speech k next speech