If we go to the next paragraph, it reads:

"The facts of the statements of case being similar (for example, the particulars of claim drafted by Reed), being a breach of confidentiality obligations, he was not sure was an issue. A barrister has to plead a case. He has done it in a way that is efficient/sensible. He must be entitled to go back and repeat that process."

The gentleman being referred to there is Mr Reed, who is the barrister you had instructed?