The transcripts of the official inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press. More…

To put it bluntly, yes. But I hope it's not a risk in terms of sort of deliberately breaching court orders or anything like that, or publishing pictures of people who are rape victims or anything like that. It's very often a matter of -- you know, particularly with privacy stories, for example, you have two -- I hope this is all right for me to say. There are two stages in the process. The first issue is: is there an Article 8 right? And then: is there an Article 10 public interest?

But as the Naomi Campbell case shows, that can be a very dry academic issue. If you go and say: how do you actually write an article and get it into the newspaper? What you have then is a question of: what about the headlines, what about this picture, that picture, what about this piece of information? So you're not just -- the editor's not just making a decision about the story as a whole, whether there's a public interest in the story or whether there's not; the editor's also making a decision about particular paragraphs, particularly pieces of information.

Keyboard shortcuts

j previous speech k next speech