Yes. I hope at that point some of our other editorial checks would come into play and, depending on the circumstances in which they'd made the statement, whether there was any privilege associated with it or -- but I would hope that -- the fact is, when -- one of the checks we have is that yes, a named source may be saying something, we would obviously be wary if it appeared to be defamatory.
We'd also apply what you could call experience and common sense to what they're saying as well. Just because someone is saying something, it doesn't necessarily say that we'll send it on to our customers. We might therefore want to go and make further checks.