Assuming that it is lawful under US law and we haven't received a complaint under US law, assuming those things, then yes.
Let me talk a little bit about why I think that is the right outcome as a policy matter. We -- you can imagine a world in which we or other Internet companies undertook to apply all countries' laws to all versions of our service, so that a user in the UK on the google.co.uk domain would see search results that had been filtered effectively for the laws of Japan and the laws of Chile and the laws of France and so forth. So the third-party websites that show up in our search index that are perfectly lawful for a UK citizen to see would all be missing. It would be a lowest common denominator of lawful speech.
This isn't an outcome that I think most people want to see, and this is the basis for our dividing our services in the way that we've described.