Yes, well, I understand that. But if I'm to make any sense at all of the terms of reference, then it seems to me I am going to have to condescend into some finding about whether there's anything to worry about. Let me put it that way. I've used the example of intercepting phone messages. I could talk about blagging. I could talk about any of the other complaints that have been made by the various witnesses. Perhaps talking about some other complaint is less offensive, because of course they're not necessarily criminal, but unless I can identify a concern as part of the narrative to justify a regulatory change, then I am not addressing, it seems to me, the terms of reference which I've been required to do.