There are a number of issues to unpick there. First of all, whether I'm enamoured of a submission or not is neither here nor there. The question is: as a matter of pure law, can you advance an argument that the government does in fact fall within the definition of a person? If you can, I'll be very happy to listen to it. If you can't, it's not a question of being enamoured by it; I just can't do it.